I liked the previous (version II) iteration of Canon’s 12x36 IS binoculars, but the stabilisation was too slow and clunky. Recently, they’ve released an updated IS III version. In this review I find out if it’s any better (spoiler alert: it is).
The first pair of Canon’s 12x36 IS I owned were great in some ways, but flawed in others. I sold them, with some regret afterwards, almost a decade ago. Since then I’ve flirted with another pair, because I recall them being excellent for astronomy. So recently (2020) I decided to get a pair of the latest spec’ (IS III) to see if I still liked them and what (if anything) has really changed.
Data from Canon/me.
The packaging for the IS III version has changed subtly. It’s still a depressingly basic box, though, if you’re used to deluxe packaging from Swarovski and Zeiss. Good for the environment, I guess.
The Canon IS range has no less than five different groups: 8x25, 10x30 and the 12x36 on test here, which share a similar non-waterproof design, are light weight and fairly cheap. Premium 10x42s which are fully waterproof, have special lenses and are mainly aimed at birders. Larger, more expensive binoculars of semi-waterproof design, with ED lenses: 15x50 and 18x50. Recent small and light-weight ‘pocket’ binoculars in 8x20 and 10x20 sizes. A new range of 32mm models featuring a different type of IS derived from their camera lenses.
